Advice and Recommendations

The Pelagic AC provides credible, scientific, and consensus-based advice to inform pelagic fisheries policy, both upon the request of the European Commission and Member States, and on its own initiative. All advice and recommendations are developed and approved by the members of the Pelagic AC. 

Our advice — and responses to it — may be accessed below.

Show Filters
NameSummaryYearDownloads
Fishing opportunities 2022

The Pelagic AC provides recommendations on TACs in 2022 for stocks under its remit.

2021 Fishing opportunities 2022
Rebuilding plan for western Baltic spring spawning herring (WBSS)

For two years running, ICES has advised a zero TAC for the western Baltic herring stock in sub-divisions 20-24. It has been the subject of discussion in our Advisory Councils, both of which advise on this stock.  ICES recently held a Working Group on rebuilding plans (WKREBUILD) from 24th – 28th February 2020. Representatives from both of the Advisory Councils took part. However, the workshop was inconclusive on what kind of approach to take towards rebuilding plans, and it is too early to conclude what the outcome of the work will be. One particular issue highlighted was the need to clarify whether the purpose of rebuilding plans is to focus on the conservation of stocks or on the continuation of a particular fishery.

2020 Rebuilding plan for western Baltic spring spawning herring (WBSS) Commission response
Advice for non-recurrent request to ICES on seismic impacts (by NWWAC and PELAC)

Both ACs consider oil/gas exploration an important sector in European offshore areas contributing to underwater noise. However, the impacts of these activities on fish, shellfish, spawning grounds and larval development, both on the long and short term, remain poorly understood by the scientific community. Both ACs are of firm belief that independent scientific research on seismic impacts is necessary and urgent. We would therefore highly encourage the development of scientific expertise by ICES in this research field, in the form of a non-recurrent request.

2020 NWWAC-PELAC submission for ICES NR request Seismic Commission response
Pelagic AC Opinion on Deep-sea mining activities

The Pelagic AC agrees with the provisions of the resolution on international ocean governance adopted by the European Parliament in January 2018 regarding deep-seabed mining. In addition to scientific concerns, the Pelagic AC supports the European Parliament’s concerns in this respect on its resolution. PELAC has 4 recommendations about this matter.

2020 PELAC opinion Deep-sea mining Commission response
Principles on banking and borrowing

Two issues relating to the implementation and sustainable use of banking and borrowing provisions provided in the CFP and the way these provisions are integrated in the design of long term management plans and underlying scientific analysis.

2020 Principles on banking and borrowing Commission response
Rebuilding plan for western horse mackerel (WHOM)

The purpose of the Western horse mackerel rebuilding plan is to ensure stock recovery to safe biomass levels and a long-term stock exploitation that is consistent with the precautionary approach and with achieving the objective of maximum sustainable yield (MSY).

2020 Letter to Commission on rebuilding plan for Western horse mackerel Annex I rebuilding plan for Western horse mackerel Letter to Commission about report western horse mackerel focus group on harvest control rule evaluations 2020 Annex I report WHOM FG on harvest control rule evaluations 2020 Commission response
Improvement of the cooperation between EFCA and the Advisory Councils

In response to EFCA’s request to the ACs to contribute with ideas on how to strengthen cooperation and on the development of TOR for the Advisory Board meetings, the Baltic AC and the Pelagic AC have made some comments.

2020 BSAC_and PELAC letter to EFCA on Advisory Board
Advice to ICES on impact of marine wind energy development (by NWWAC, PELAC, NSAC)

The three ACs are pleased with the establishment of the ICES Working Group on Offshore Wind Development and Fisheries (WGOWDF) in 2020. They firmly believe that independent scientific research on the impacts of marine wind energy developments on commercial fish stocks is necessary and timely, as a basis for defining appropriate measures for the protection of essential fishing grounds. The three ACs therefore ask the European Commission to consider the research questions formulated in the recommendation as a basis for a non-recurrent request to ICES, which will support future work of the ACs Ecosystem work in developing advice for the preservation of essential habitats for relevant fish stocks.

In its response, the Commission has indicated that it would be unable to put forward such request to ICES as it was not deemed appropriate for a non-recurrent request. However, the Commission expressed willingness to engage with the three ACs on this topic through an informal meeting, but was constrained by the Brexit negotiations throughout most of 2021. The Pelagic AC will pursue an opportunity in the next financial year to discuss with the Commission and the co-signatory ACs alternative options for increased scientific input.

2020 NWWAC-PELAC-NSAC advice for a non-recurrent request to ICES on the impact of marine wind energy developments on commercial fish stocks Commission response
Call for adjustment of capacity rules CFP to accommodate fair labour

The Pelagic AC supports the Social Dialogue in its prioritization of fair and equitable labour conditions for workers onboard fishing vessels, and its call to align capacity rules of the CFP to accommodate the ratification of international labour standards.

2020 Letter to Europeche on alignment CFP and labour standards
“Maritime sector – a green post-COVID future” Roadmap

In response to Commission consultation for a new approach for a sustainable Blue Economy, the members of the LDAC, MAC, MEDAC, NSAC, NWWAC, and PelAC have joined forces to submit a joint advice. The new approach to a sustainable Blue Economy is shaped by the Commission together with stakeholders and will also be implemented in collaboration. Therefore, the ACs collectively provided input by addressing challenges and opportunities related to the Commission’s new Blue Economy approach based on their relevant expertise in fisheries, aquaculture, seafood processing, trading, and retailing. The sector is highly regulated, and its members persistently strive to address the balance between the three pillars of sustainability through individual, national or trans-national initiatives. The stakeholders of the different ACs look forward to a future opportunity to discuss the new approach to a Blue economy further with the Commission.

2020 Multi-AC advice on the "Maritime sector - a green post-COVID future" Roadma (letter) Multi-AC advice on the “Maritime sector – a green post-COVID future” Roadmap (attachment) Commission response

We use third-party cookies to personalise content and analyse site traffic.

Learn more